The court will rule they aren’t soldiers and it was necessary for “public safety” and “for the children”.
Nothing to see here. Next!
what’s worse, the forcible taking or the chorus of hopelessness being raised here? if we wonder where the people’s power has gone... it’s not because of bad politics or bad plans or even bad people... it’s because of bad theology... we’ve LOST OUR GRIP ON THE GOSPEL PROMISE. I ain’t selling you no patent religion or some sect you’ll find under some private roof and nobody else’s. I’m selling you the Holy Spirit who is everywhere and the bible which can be had at any bookstore in a plethora of versions.
I’d like to be on the jury, in a case like this there is no difference in uniformed armed military or uniformed armed police and having no warrant does make a difference. This was not an emergency situation but a surveliance situation. To be forced to cooperate at gunpoint is not being asked to cooperate. I would personally like to cooperate if possible with police but leaving my home and turning it over to them overa domestic dispute appears to unreasonable. This sounds to me that more than likely a high up in the department suspects a spouse, boy or girlfriend of sleeping around. Surveliance over a domestic dispute seems “over the top”
The court's current go to is to say that the plaintiff does not have standing.