You really need to read much more carefully. I claimed no knowledge of what Wyoming does or does not want. My comment was strictly about a common form of NYT's 'journalism' used to give the impression they have established some point after interviewing two or three people.
Hate to have to burst your self important bubble, Senor, but “And they constantly obtain anecdotes from two or three people and act like they’ve proven some point beyond any doubt, whatever point they wanted to make in the first place. (The people of Wyoming don’t want Liz Cheney to run.)” is a WRITING deficiency not a reading one.