Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain

The prosecution said that there was no DNA from Martin on Zimmerman’s gun. That information was designed to create doubt about the theory the neighborhood watch volunteer shot Martin only to prevent the teen from reaching the weapon first. However, The holster of Zimmerman’s gun had DNA from at least three people. One is Zimmerman, but it is uncertain whether one of the two remaining was Martin. Who are the other one or two unidentified people?

Perhaps the defense will nail this DNA inconsistency next week. It may be as simple as Zimmerman got to the gun first when he realized Martin’s hand was going after it.


35 posted on 07/06/2013 1:52:27 PM PDT by jonrick46 (The opium of Communists: other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jonrick46

the prosecution said there was other dna which could not exclude tm.


40 posted on 07/06/2013 2:03:26 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson