To: Tzfat
” It is not unlikely they were following the wrong glideslope “
CNN just stated that Flightaware shows a steeper glideslope for this aircraft today, than for the same flight yesterday.
361 posted on
07/06/2013 2:00:45 PM PDT by
tcrlaf
(Well, it is what the Sheeple voted for....)
To: tcrlaf
CNN just stated that Flightaware shows a steeper glideslope for this aircraft today, than for the same flight yesterday.
"Glideslope" has a very specific meaning in aviation. It always means "vertical path associated with a Instrument Landing System (ILS)." What CNN should have said was a "steeper glidepath' - that means they simply descending in a steeper angle. No two visual approaches are the same. Because the ILS was out of service (and the associated LDA approach), they were likely using RNAV for vertical guidance - however that close in, they were more likely using VASI and visually adjusting for the landing.
It seems quite likely that this is simply a screwed up landing. They landed short. It has happened on that runway more than once. JAL put a DC-8 in the bay there.
381 posted on
07/06/2013 2:09:07 PM PDT by
Tzfat
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson