Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ben Mugged
FYI, "drunk" was initially defined as .20% blood alcohol level.

It then went to .12%, .10%, then .08% and is now headed for .05%.

At some point, blood alcohol content came to be interpolated from breath alcohol content, which unfortunately uses the same partition rate for every human as a faulty premise.

At some point "driving while intoxicated" became "driving while impaired", resulting in people getting thrown into the DWI grinder and criminal justice system with a 0.00% blood and breath alcohol concentration.

The definition of "impaired" then became something called in most state statutes "impaired to the slightest degree" by the LEO harassing people on the side of the road.

I'm still waiting for the first news story about a driver that is too short or fat or both to work the foot pedals or the steering wheel.

This is all hysteria designed to separate people from their transportation and assets.

235 posted on 07/12/2013 3:16:21 PM PDT by elkfersupper ( Member of the Original Defiant Class)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]


To: elkfersupper

How would you define the limit at which a responsible person can drive? That is, considering my rights also to not be killed by them.


236 posted on 07/12/2013 6:01:40 PM PDT by Ben Mugged (The number one enemy of liberalism is reality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson