When the defense gets to present it’s case MOM should call Martin’s father to the stand and ask him did he think it was his son’s voice that he heard on the tape screaming. Afterall he raised the boy from the age of 4 till the day he died. His mother, who’s so damn certain it was her “baby”, will hear her ex-husband say he can’t tell if it’s his son’s voice. Now he’s the man who raised him, not the woman who gave him away. Then MOM can bring the retired US Army officer and retired Virginia Magistrate father of George and he will swear under oath that the voice in question was his son. Who has the most credability. A woman who’s feeling sorry for herself for not being part of her dead son’s life or a father who happens to be a retired Army colonel and retired magistrate, who was involved in every aspect of his son’s life and still is. Then the last witness should be George’s mother, who actually raised him, along with his father.
“When the defense gets to present it’s case MOM should call Martin’s father to the stand and ask him did he think it was his son’s voice that he heard on the tape screaming. Afterall he raised the boy from the age of 4 till the day he died. His mother, who’s so damn certain it was her “baby”, will hear her ex-husband say he can’t tell if it’s his son’s voice. Now he’s the man who raised him, not the woman who gave him away. Then MOM can bring the retired US Army officer and retired Virginia Magistrate father of George and he will swear under oath that the voice in question was his son. Who has the most credability. A woman who’s feeling sorry for herself for not being part of her dead son’s life or a father who happens to be a retired Army colonel and retired magistrate, who was involved in every aspect of his son’s life and still is. Then the last witness should be George’s mother, who actually raised him, along with his father.”
That all makes good sense; but you’re forgetting that this trial is in Florida - anything could happen!