Serino told the court he believed Zimmerman was relieved after being told by investigators last year – falsely – that video may exist of the shooting. Serino had testified on Monday that he tried to bluff Zimmerman about the existence of a video to provoke a reaction and gauge Zimmerman’s assertion
And Z was relieved thinking there was a video to vindicate
his story.
Why is this farce continuing?
So the investigator lied to the victim and says that the victim may have been inaccurate in his account of the number of times he was pounded?