Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DCBryan1

it is still a civil war no matter what you call it.

A rose by any other name still has thorns.


50 posted on 07/02/2013 11:21:19 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: longtermmemmory

The people of Atlanta Ga in 1864 didn’t think it was to “civil”.


51 posted on 07/02/2013 11:23:51 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: longtermmemmory
it is still a civil war no matter what you call it.

Au contraire, mon frere. A civil war is fought within a country where two or more factions seek to gain control of the government of that country. With the War of Secession, the South was not at all interested in gaining control of the US government. They simply wanted to be left alone as they were promised they could in the event they no longer wanted to be part of the United States.

Calling this war a 'civil war' would be comparable to calling any war of independence a 'civil war'. The Commonwealth of Virginia sought peaceful independence from the constraints of the Washington-based central government. At no time did they seek to gain control of said government.

55 posted on 07/02/2013 11:49:13 AM PDT by Hoodat (BENGHAZI - 4 KILLED, 2 MIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson