Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: central_va

If Gettysburg was lost, their was nothing to keep Lee out of DC. The Notrth would be forced to sue for pease otherwise DC would go up in flames again.


4 posted on 07/01/2013 6:34:06 AM PDT by DownInFlames
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: DownInFlames

Lee was not Sherman, there would have been a brief occupation but no burning, like Atlanta. Urban warfare was rare back then. Looking back nothing was going to make the Goon come to the table and the South did not have the strength to hold any Northern territories. Mr Lincoln’s War would have no negotiated ending. The butchery would continue, actually it picked up speed after G-burg.


7 posted on 07/01/2013 7:12:45 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: DownInFlames
If Gettysburg was lost, their was nothing to keep Lee out of DC. The Notrth would be forced to sue for pease otherwise DC would go up in flames again.

I agree with central_va, Lee was not a fan of what we now call total (or "modern") warfare, unlike Sherman.
9 posted on 07/01/2013 1:47:46 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson