A workman-like lawyering job, correct?
No matter what is presented on the other side, O’Mara is supposed to take it and make it work for the defense.
If it already works for the defense but could be improved, or if there are questions that a juror might be asking themselves about the presentation etc, it’s his job to get the best he can for his client, on cross.
The fact that he does that routinely no matter what is presented, shows not necessarily that something has made his client look guilty but it shows he must put on the best possible defense presentation at all times.
The details he addresses will vary throughout this trial, but the general picture that impresses me is that the State has no case, nothing, that shows Zimmerman is guilty of any crime much less 2nd degree murder.
I believe you meant this post for Rummychick.
Good points.