Skip to comments.
House Conservatives Push for Marriage Amendment After Supreme Court Ruling
National Journal ^
| Updated: June 26, 2013 | 2:01 p.m.
| Matt Vasilogambros
Posted on 06/26/2013 3:58:01 PM PDT by Red Steel
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: freemike
You are correct. Newt has said this many times. Dirty little secret.. the congress designates what cases courts can hear. Like Romney, Newt was made a laughing stock when the real joke was on the ass hats that threw them under the bus. Ignorance is bless.
To: IronJack
You’re presuming it’ll get the needed votes in Congress. That’s pretty unlikely right now.
22
posted on
06/26/2013 4:59:47 PM PDT
by
Coronal
To: MeganC
there must be several hundred well-chosen simultaneous “firings on ft sumter” to have any chance at all at success.
23
posted on
06/26/2013 5:14:48 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: wku man
american christian minutemen forces
24
posted on
06/26/2013 5:15:52 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: madprof98
if republicans had half the conviction and courage to followthrough no matter what’ that the libtards have, we could overturn roe.
they don’t want to fight. many’don’t really strongly believe in conservative ideals, they are milktoasts when it comes to principles and having a solid moral foundation they actually believe in, know how to defend, and will actually defend with ferocity and fervor.
25
posted on
06/26/2013 5:19:03 PM PDT
by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Red Steel
26
posted on
06/26/2013 5:20:31 PM PDT
by
DungeonMaster
( 1Cor 7:21Were you called while a slave? Do not be concerned about it;)
To: Responsibility2nd
Well because they can’t.. the constitution provides for amendments and if they don’t allow it I can guarantee you that some judges are coming out of that room in handcuffs and if not that then there will be no choice for blood to be spilled.
To: Dan(9698)
Well, I confess that is not something that I have knowledge of, but I am interested to see if the GOP would use such a protection. I expect not, but hopefully I’m wrong.
28
posted on
06/26/2013 5:42:15 PM PDT
by
chris37
(Heartless.)
To: Red Steel
Better Gay Marriage than amnesty or Puerto Rican statehood.
29
posted on
06/26/2013 5:53:49 PM PDT
by
Clemenza
("History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil governm)
To: LibsRJerks
Divorce lawyers celebrate.
To: Clemenza
"Better Gay Marriage than amnesty or Puerto Rican statehood." We're going to get them all, count on it. The GOP is spineless, both the so-called leaders and the rank and file membership. They are, as Rush would call them, the New Castrati. Who's going to stand in the way of the Leftist agenda now? They have all the momentum, so get ready for cap and tax, seizure of retirement funds, UN gun control, the whole shebang. No one's gonna stand up to 'em.
Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!
31
posted on
06/26/2013 8:24:49 PM PDT
by
wku man
(Amnesty? No Way, Jose (No Se Puede!) by 10 Pound Test http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsTUQ8yOI2c)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson