Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pallis

We are at a negative state now, there is not turning back......amazing as many people opposed to homosexuality in the US (the polls are bogus, just watch peoples behavior) there are not demonstrations in the street.
A small country like France had over 4,000,000 people on the streets.....and there have been continued upheaval since they changed their laws.
Why wont we?


76 posted on 06/26/2013 10:16:52 AM PDT by svcw (Stand or die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: svcw

Megan Kelly explained it a it better or clearer I think- but is still getting it mixed up statign the reason it wasn’t heard in SC was because gove and state ‘wouldn’t defend prop 8” however, the gov and state NEVER supported prop 8 to my knowledge- it wass the PEOPLER bringing the case tro supreme court, not the state?

She said basically, 1: the peopel voted to ban gay marriage, 2: their vote was challenged at the trial court level, and the peopel lost- prop 8 was overturned, but then 3: the gov and state refused to defend prop 8 so 4: the surpeme court refused to hear the case statign the proper people aren’t here to continue hearign hte case

Meaning- the peopel ghave no right to represent themselves, and that ONLY the ‘proper entities’ (meanign state officials) can brign the case/defend the case

Basically the SC said the state is the only ones who can make rules/laws- the peopel can not- Basically the SC indicated it is agaisnt hte law for the peopel to bring propositions to a vote fro mwhat I understand


78 posted on 06/26/2013 10:38:10 AM PDT by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson