Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MNDude

It’s amazing they ended up with an all female jury with no blacks. It could be that all the blacks, male or female, and maybe all the males of any group, came across as holding some prejudicial attitudes concerning the racial element of the case, or the right to self-defense, to an extent that none of them seem capable of objectivity.

But we’ll definitely hear a lot about the makeup of the jury from here on.


20 posted on 06/21/2013 11:52:55 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Will88
But we’ll definitely hear a lot about the makeup of the jury from here on.

Knowing the proclivity of the MSM for focusing on the really, really important things, we'll hear about their makeup, their shoes, their hair, their clothes...

But darned little about the concept of self-defense, nor the Right to defend one's self.

72 posted on 06/21/2013 2:07:07 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Will88
But we’ll definitely hear a lot about the makeup of the jury from here on.

Yes we will. And can you guess why?

100 posted on 06/21/2013 8:03:05 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (I am a dissident. Will you join me? My name is John....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson