Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan

“the state can put them in limbo”

What is the origin of this notion?


76 posted on 06/17/2013 10:08:53 PM PDT by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]


To: Ray76
The SCOTUS decision states:

We note, however, that while the NVRA forbids States to demand that an applicant submit additional information beyond that required by the Federal Form, it does not preclude States from "deny[ing] registration based on information in their possession establing the applicant's ineligibility."
So while Arizona must accept the federal form, it can also put that form on hold while it examines any records in the state's possession (and presumably to which it has access) that indicate that the applicant is not a U.S. citizen. That information can come from any number of sources: jury response forms, arrest records, deportation records, etc. In short, the burden is on the State to prove that an applicant is ineligible rather than the applicant having to prove that he is eligible. Thus the federal form sits "in limbo" while the State takes time to do some research.
118 posted on 06/18/2013 10:16:06 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson