[Perdogg]

Nonetheless, while the NVRA forbids States to demand that an applicant submit additional information beyond that required by the Federal Form, it does not preclude States from “deny[ing] registration based on information in their possession establishing the applicant’s ineligibility.” Pp. 6–13.

[DBeers]

Nonetheless, while the NVRA forbids States to demand that an applicant submit additional information beyond that required by the Federal Form, it does not preclude States from “deny[ing] registration based on information in their possession establishing the applicant’s ineligibility.” Pp. 6–13.

As well, the Court held that in the future, Arizona can ask the federal Election Assistance Commission (EAC), which creates the federal form, to include a requirement of additional proof of citizenship in the form, and to bring different legal challenges if the EAC refuses to do so.

WHEN will Arizona do this AND how many other States will join in.

As an aside I find it ironic that SCOTUS refers to Congress having the ability to define some voting issues regarding the States as premise for this ruling YET then suggests the State request from EAC (a bureaucratic commission with Executive appointed members) that they add the proof of citizenship requirement. BIZARRE how Congress both delegated the Executive added powers and diminished State powers with this leftist voter equality nonsense.