Rather than rely on your revisionism, why not go straight to the horse's mouth, so to speak, as to what the figures depicted on the monument actually represent? This is a book that the United Daughers of the Confederacy, the organization who funded the monument, had to say about it. After all, who would know better than the UDC on what message they were trying to portray? Link
"But our sculptor, who is writing history in bronze, also pictures the South in another attitude, the South as she was in 1861-1865...Then the sons and daughters of the South are seen coming from every direction. The manner in which they crowd enthusiastically upon each other is one of the most impressive features of this colossal work. There they come, representing every branch of the service, and in proper garb; soldiers, sailors, sappers and miners, all typified. On the right is a faithful negro body-servant following his young master, Mr. Thomas Nelson Pages realistic Marse Chan over again.
The artist had grown up, like Page, in that embattled old Virginia where Marse Chan was so often enacted... And there is another story told here, illustrating the kindly relations that existed all over the South between the master and the slave a story that can not be too often repeated to generations in which Uncle Toms Cabin survives and is still manufacturing false ideas as to the South and slavery in the fifties. The astonishing fidelity of the slaves everywhere during the war to the wives and children of those who were absent in the army was convincing proof of the kindly relations between master and slave in the old South.Still to the right of the young soldier and his body-servant is an officer, kissing his child in the arms of an old negro mammy. Another child holds on to the skirts of mammy and is crying, perhaps without knowing why."