Just spent a good part of an hour tracking down several threads where one of your friends ~ certainly not one of mine ~ called down the mods on me when all that had gone on was I posted a response followed by '(/s)' ~ which is totally wierd.
Otherwise your stuff is pretty much the same as mine except you sometimes read the 4th and ignore 'unreasonable' ~ an easy error ~ kind of like that guy Bush appointed to the Supreme Court telling us the 'takings' clause in the 5th didn't apply where the gub'mnt was taking property from a poor man to hand over to a rich man.
So there can be differences of opinion on this stuff, but there are too many instances where someone calls in the mods.
So, should you check threads to see if i've already posted and just not comment, or the other way around?
In short, what do these people want? ~ BTW, no cussing. If I don't get to do it, neither should others unless they can prove a medical need.
What part of the meat of the fourth do you not understand?
...and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
The government is waaaay out of bounds here.