Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Albion Wilde

BAD IDEA!

Refer to the Fourth Amendment.


8 posted on 06/11/2013 3:34:04 AM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: dinodino

It would be nice to know if a teen was texting when they smacked your bumper and caused over $2,000 worth of damage though. Happened to me a few years ago and yes she was texting.


9 posted on 06/11/2013 3:53:32 AM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: dinodino; driftdiver

Like I said, the law would have to exclude any evidence other than the time of the last call. Anything else would be inadmissible in court.


10 posted on 06/11/2013 3:55:41 AM PDT by Albion Wilde ("There can be no dialogue with the prince of this world." -- Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: dinodino
Refer to the Fourth Amendment.

I've heard of that, years ago in a history class. Wasn't that part of the Constitution back before Obama fundamentally transformed America? I have no problem with a warrant based upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing that either my cell phone or my cell phone records are to be searched, but otherwise my right to be secure in my person, house, papers (including my cell phone provider's records), and effects (including my cell phone) against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated.

38 posted on 06/11/2013 5:20:33 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson