Replies

Thank you.

For the Kenyan’s child to be considered for adoption in April ‘61, it’s patently obvious the child is not hte offspring of Stanley Ann Dunham.

Be back hopefully tomorrow...

185 posted on 06/15/2013 9:44:56 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)

To: little jeremiah

And it’s patently obvious also why the unredacted memo was truncated; the Miss Da....wasn’t Miss Dunham, she was a Miss Da...from the Salvation Army.

186 posted on 06/15/2013 10:29:36 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum!)

To: little jeremiah

No kidding, one has to wonder how long it took Jacobs to work out how best to twist that paragraph we can only see the half of, into this:

According to the INS memo concerning her April conversation with Dahling, the INS administrator, ‘Subject [Obama] got his USC [United Sates citizen] wife ‘Hapai’ [pidgin for pregnant] and although they were married they do not live together and Miss Dunham is making arrangements with the Salvation Army to give the baby away.

Because the way that memo has been truncated, the name she maintains is Miss Dunham might very well be Miss Dahling...and someone has made a slight adjustment to the 'h' in Dahling ...so that all we see is Danl

We're talking about adopting out a child that won't be born until August, a couple of months after a marriage?

187 posted on 06/15/2013 11:27:44 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (Fair Dinkum!)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794