Posted on 06/09/2013 1:47:50 PM PDT by Cold Case Posse Supporter
Lt. Mike Zullo in a weekend radio interview revealed that Barack Obama's August 4, 1961 birthday may not actually be true. Zullo stated that August 4, 1961 could have been the day the plane from Kenya landed in Hawaii and was used as Obama's birthday for the record. He made the allegation that the birth certificate that Perkins Coie lawyer Judith Corley flew to Hawaii to get and return it to Washington was not the document that was presented to the American public on April 27,2011. For more stunning information from Mike Zullo, listen to the two part interview.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
Thanks for the ping.
Forget about impeachment. My God, the guy is obviously a criminal. We need a Special Prosecutor.
Even traveling from Hawaii to Washington with a baby that age would have been virtually impossible much less Kenya.
A baby that age cannot clear their ears like an adult so the pressure up and pressure down would have ruptured his eardrums more than likely.
_____________________________________________________
Stanley picked up “her” new baby in Washington State. She is a surrogate mother.
Absolutely, there are numerous federal felonies committed by Obummer and the Democratic Party.
So, what is that supposed to mean? It is not Arpaio that is the problem, he has the investigation wrapped up in a nice bow. All that is required is one honest prosecutor and one honest judge. At present, none can be found.
My bet is that Stanley Ann was pregnant
_____________________________________________________
Where is the proof that she was pregnant? Nobody ever saw her as such.
Hecklers on the sidelines.
I’m not a heckler.I just have a realistic knowledge of this country born of many,many years of attendance at the School of Hard Knocks
_______________________________________________
You sure fit the definition of a heckler.
WOW! Thanks for that info. I have had my $ on Zullo for some time now. He was the right man at the right time w the right backing. Let us keep him in our prayers. The next few mos are crucial.
________________________________________________
A financial donation to the Cold Case Posse would be much appreciated.
Too bad the commies/Dems don’t have your utter defeatism attitude. In fact, your defeatism is so aggressive it’s almost a “reverse fighting spirit” attitude! You’re practically gleeful.
Don’t you mean “nanny”? And maybe she picked him up in Canada, unless you have some specific info?
that may be true but you are certainly not HELPING in any way on this issue
It would have a lot more traction if NOT FOR COMMENTS LIKE YOURS
If you feel we are barking up the wrong tree then feel free to pursue whatever other ideas you like, but why piss on our favorite topic? I happend to be a computer engineer and imaging is one of my areas of exptertice- is it yours?
There are many other things to nail this bastard on- while YOU are not doing anything to advance any agenda AND denigrating our ‘birther’ issues you are doubly wasting your time and ours.
Go take another avenue of attack to help us rid the country of this traitor, if you like. Its like you are on the front line shooting backwards at us, instead of forward at the enemy.
First we need to define the word "traction".Bottom line:convince me that there's a real possibility of seeing Osama Obama being led from the WH in cuffs....or simply removed from office,a la Nixon, before January '17...because of *this* matter...and I'm on board 1000%.Of course Osama Obama is a Maoist.Of course he's a filthy,worthless psychopath.Shortening his stay in the WH by a single day is a *very* worthy pursuit.And the IRS stuff and/or Benghazi just might do it.But the birth certificate,to the majority of Americans,is a sideshow and will remain that way even if Osama openly admits,in writing,that he's Constitutionally ineligible to serve as POTUS.
As you may know,Rush (who's far more "plugged in" than he lets on) believes that *nothing* will drive Osama from office early.I won't go that far but I firmly believe that *this* will not,regardless of how it plays out.
OK,fair enough.In spite of what some here believe I'm not telling anyone to stop this process.If "the smoking gun" is,by some miracle,found (and how hard do you think the entire Rat Party...funded by Soros & Pals...are trying to prevent that from happening?) it will be seen,at worst,as embarrassing to Osama Obama.But I could be wrong...I've been wrong before.Just a few years ago I said,with tears in my eyes,that Scott Brown didn't have a prayer.I was wrong,wrong,wrong.I said the same thing last November and I was absolutely correct.So my batting average for political predictions is less than .1000 but greater than .000
“even if he’s shown irrefutably to be Constitutionally ineligible”....that won’t hurt him in the eyes of Americans? seems to me that this would make Americans think: he’s doin’ all this horrible stuff to us, and he’s not even an American?
Unless I'm mistaken *nobody* is denying the fact that Osama Obama is a US citizen.My understanding is that under Federal laws in effect at the time he was a US citizen from the moment of birth *regardless* of where he was born.I think the issue is is he a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution to serve as President.
Perkins Coie lawyer Judith Corley - I would hate to be the insurance company holding her term policy.
Gee - Let’s play spot the Fogblowers on the thread.
Right now we are at 2 or more.
“.My understanding is that under Federal laws in effect at the time he was a US citizen from the moment of birth *regardless* of where he was born.”
He wouldn’t have even been considered a U.S. Citizen if he was born in Kenya due to the fact that his mother would not have been old enough to transfer citizenship to him based on the laws at that time in 1961.
I realize that there are numerous conjectures about Obama’s birth and birth family. I just tend to put more credence in events as my dots indicate. One dot is that Obama’s relatives in Kenya at one time mentioned the birth along with the facts that Obama had his future associations in Kenya. I assume that, if so, these people saw a pregnant Stanley Ann as well as the new born baby and though it might be no one had made it public before that time .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.