Bush’s vetting team likely knew. Just sit back and count the number of homosexuals in and associated with his administration.
Everyone ELSE knew. They did too.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4785876
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/05/politics/politicsspecial1/05roberts.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
http://articles.latimes.com/2005/aug/04/nation/na-roberts4
Now ask yourself why, exactly, a ‘nice Catholic boy’ would do pro bono work of that sort. He was hardly forced to pick that particular group.
Possibly. But you missed one of the points I made. That is that the Left can turn something insignificant into a scandal. So what is a non-issue for those seeing things from the Right can easily be manipulated into a full blown scandal, with the sychophant butt kissing support of the media. In addition, how long has Roberts be on the court? It has been about 10 years now, long enough for the Democrats to find something to use. Whatever it was that got him to abandon his professed principles may have occurred after Bush vetted him. Or for all we know the issue could have been something to embarrass Robert’s wife or other family member. It is all just speculation at this point. But obviously something happened to make Roberts do a 180 degree turn on his judicial philosophy. With Obama’s minions accessing all US citizens’ communication, whether via phone, email, texts, or online, I hardly would think that they would ignore Roberts.