If someone wants to fight a ticket based on those camera’s, how does the camera answer when cross examined...the camera is the accuser not anyone from the chicken stick government...we have a right to face our accuser in a court of law.....
“.we have a right to face our accuser in a court of law.....”
agreed.
But what does this mean? One can legitimately wiretap, with a warrant and probable cause, etc. The recording hears you arranging a robbery. Is it then your accuser? I’d say the wiretapper is.
Also in the case of a red light camera, the camera is not your accuser, but the cop who reviews the footage or whatever.
I am not defending red light cameras. I just don’t think you necessarily need an eyewitness to be an accuser to be accused of a crime.