Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie

” Bush was the enabler here. Not that Zero wouldn’t do this on his own.”

Bush had two wars. Obama says those are over. Why does he need this in peacetime?


17 posted on 06/05/2013 8:53:09 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (President Obma; The Slumlord of the Rentseekers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Lurkina.n.Learnin
Bush had two wars.

That is no excuse to flout the Fourth Amendment. The PATRIOT Act does not supersede the Constitution. This isn't about posturing; it is about UNALIENABLE AND PREEXISTING RIGHTS. Those rights have been systematically violated. There were other and more effective ways to deal with terrorists on American soil.

22 posted on 06/05/2013 8:59:13 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (An economy is not a zero-sum game, but politics usually is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Lurkina.n.Learnin

I think 0 is simply expanding the scope of the Patriot Act to use it as a tool of control and oppression. If GWB hadn’t done it, 0 would have installed it just the same probably with even more intrusive measures. The Patriot Act was only enacted as a direct of the worst terrorist act to ever occur on U.S. soil. The Left seems to forget or ignore that.


23 posted on 06/05/2013 9:02:26 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson