[BykrBayb]

That was one of his posts explaining why he supports open homosexuality in the BSA. His posts followed a pattern of supporting faggotry, and of verbally assaulting anyone who disagreed. He said that BSA is good for boys, even if it involves homosexuality. When i disagreed, he told me that if I didn’t agree with the homosexualization of children I shouldn’t be allowed to be a Scout Leader. One of his arguments in favor of allowing open homosexuality in BSA was that it isn’t contagious, and parents could raise their children not to be affected by aggressive recruiting from perverts. He argued that we should allow homosexuals unfettered access to our children, and if we are good parents our children will remain unharmed. If we don’t allow this destructive influence on our children, we are bad parents who shouldn’t be allowed in positions of influence over children, but faggots should be.

I’m not the only one who saw stuartcr for what he was. He wasn’t zotted for a single poorly worded post. He was zotted for his aggressive support of faggotry in BSA. His was the third such zot I recently witnessed on this subject, and I bet there have been at least a few more.

[jboot]

Stuartcr was a long-term and rather clever troll. In his fifteen years on FR he never once articulated a genuine conservative position, but he mostly managed to avoid fully articulating liberal positions as well. Instead, he was a passive-aggressive PITA who relentlessly badgered conservative FReepers with leading questions and high-handed dismissals. He was anti-religion in addition to being pro-gay and most of his worst abuses were in the Religion forum.

And he really liked the word "sanctimonious". In fact he often used it as a synonym for "Christian" and even for "conservative". The game is afoot...