Replies

The population control wackjobs have enough stock to sit on the board of directors.

Ask Fox News how that reporting of Islamic terror changed once Al-Waleed bin Talal bought enough to sit on the board of directors.

The entire function of the Gates Foundation is population control. Because there are too many OTHER people. Bill’s DNA is just fine. That’s why he has THREE children. You however only need one but preferably none.

Gates, Buffet and Soros are all obsessed with making abortion easily available worldwide. Buffet is absolutely obsessed with this. He also supports the estate tax. Not a conservative position. He was also a biggie supporter of The won. Also not a conservative position.

It wouldn’t be the first time there was a large corporation with an agenda. Cigarettes had sutff added to the formulation to make them even more addictive. And the corporations denied that for generations. Except they’d really been doing it all along.

Soros is obsessed with only one thing, making profits. His gifts to liberal groups and his efforts to strengthen liberal press agencies are to establish socialism in the US. Because he is a liberal. In the Gates family.....Melinda is the liberal, Bill just goes along. What you don't understand about the uber rich is that much of what they do regarding liberal causes is to keep the poor and the ignorant rabble from coming up the driveway with torches and pitchforks. It's a tactic. With some exceptions and that is why you can't pigeon hole them. Soros is indeed a dangerous man, but the Gates's are just pitiful people with far to much money. And Warren Buffet is a old fool who has lost his ability to insult people and enjoy it. He just rolls with the flow. Trying very hard to act and look like a normal guy so that the pitchforks don't come after him too.

They all have nothing to worry about from conservatives. The people they worry about are the liberals who will eat them if they disappoint.

Cigarettes had sutff added to the formulation to make them even more addictive

Really!

It amazes me that you could be on this forum and enjoy it....

But then it seems a lot of people are here because of social reasons and not political.

BTW....the additive case was totally taken out of real context and they made a mountain out of nothing. All quality companies do this, and the small ones really can't afford to they control quality more through their repeated tobacco blending with out doing anything more. This results in occasional batches that are not up to snuff, so to speak.

All the cigarette company did was to monitor the nicotine content in the product they sold and try to make every batch to the same specifications of quality. Since tobaccos vary from growing season to season farm to farm the company had to spend some effort blending and sometimes used additives to guarantee product quality. There nicotine levels were no higher or lower than anyone else's. Just consistent from batch to batch, season to season, year to year, in tar, nicotine, taste. There is no benefit to increasing nicotine levels beyond the advertised amount as more nicotine beyond a certain level can make you sick, or worse you buy less cigarettes. It was a ridiculous assertion!

As a smoker, I know perfectly well that nicotine content varies with brand. Consistency is much more important than content to me. But for the record I smoke Marlboro reds...the short ones in a box. (and I like it)