If you are not completely supportive of the administration and whatever policies and initiatives they put forward, then you are a threat to "national security".
This criminal rejection of the Constitution and clumsy restructuring of the English language has gone on unnoticed and unchallenged.
Congress not only can, but it should narrowly define what constitutes National Security. It does not now nor ever apply to arbitrary and capricious "policies" thrown out willy-nilly by the executive of any party. And if it is attempted, it should be eliminated immediately and forcefully. If not by the elected criminals, by the people, by whatever means are necessary.
Every time these oafs spout the words "national security," I wince. To them, the words mean whatever they want it to mean, no matter how absurd or even criminal in its result. Who can challenge that? Where are the checks and balances?
Didn't we once had a Federal ombudsman who responded to the ultimate power, The People?
Whatever happened to that position?
Was it too bothersome to the elected criminals and cramped their style?
Well, its time for change, I hope permanently this time!
The time for permanent and effective leashes for the beasts is overdue. These are the times that try men's souls...