To: IllumiNaughtyByNature
Her lawyer knew this and had her do it this way. That way she gets to have it both ways. No lawyer working in DC would have her do that unless thats EXACTLY what he wanted. or she went rogue, and if thats the case, the lawyer will say so. just sayin....
I was wondering about that. What do they have to gain if this was intentional?
191 posted on
05/22/2013 1:31:50 PM PDT by
PA Engineer
(Liberate America from the Occupation Media.)
To: PA Engineer
I don’t know whether it was intentional or not. But there is a wild possibility that she did not commit any crimes but knows who did. There is a common desire to not be a “rat” or disloyal. Now she can be compelled to testify. But she can say “they tricked me and I couldn’t protect you.”
It will be hard for her to say she didn’t testify when all the networks broadcasted it for all the world to see.
Maybe now that she is forced to testify she can bargain for immunity and a new identity.
To: PA Engineer
What do they have to gain if this was intentional? She gains the ability to claim, i took the 5th (which the WH probably told her to do) and also get to testify so it all doesn't fall on her head by saying..."oops, they got me on a technicality and forced me to testify."
241 posted on
05/22/2013 1:48:36 PM PDT by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
($1.84 - The price of a gallon of gas on Jan. 20th, 2009.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson