To: Defiant
They should just give her immunity and force her to testify. No one cares about her jail time. Best not to offer immunity until you have learned what the truth actually is.
Offered immunity, she would be free to offer misleading testimony...and would not be subject to a charge of perjury.
Save the grant of immunity for later, when you'll have more leverage.
21 posted on
05/21/2013 11:53:02 PM PDT by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE --)
To: okie01
Not true. You can still be prosecuted for perjury, it’s a new crime. I dont really care about her, i want the capo of this regime.
24 posted on
05/22/2013 12:18:44 AM PDT by
Defiant
(The answer to Francis Scott Key's question is: No, it does not. That land is no more.)
To: okie01
Offered immunity, she would be free to offer misleading testimony...and would not be subject to a charge of perjury. I read on another thread that the offer of immunity is negotiated between the sides lawyers......and the general area of information and who is implicated spelled out.....
so if the client suddenly "can't recall" or is misleading then the immunity is withdrawn.
26 posted on
05/22/2013 1:21:06 AM PDT by
spokeshave
(The only people better off today than 4 years ago are the Prisoners at Guantanamo.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson