Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dan Nunn
Much irony. How can he be prosecuted for the crime if, by liberal logic, the child was not a living being...
5 posted on 05/16/2013 7:01:07 AM PDT by ejonesie22 (8/30/10, the day Truth won.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ejonesie22

So, just so I’m not missing anything.

If she had known what she was taking then it would have been OK. Same result for the baby. No crime..

But since he gave her the drug..then it is murder? Or some lesser equivalent. Same result, baby dead.

The hoops the liberal mind has to jump through on a daily basis is just astounding.


8 posted on 05/16/2013 7:43:53 AM PDT by saleman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ejonesie22; Dan Nunn

Read the comments at the article. Some people are arguing how can the father of the child be charged with murder since it’s “legally OK” for the mother to kill the child via abortion.

It’s really distressing how morally bankrupt people are.

Some are also arguing for what some posters here have called a “paper abortion” — if the mother wants the child and the father does not, he gets to permanently sign away all responsibilities to raise the child to his/her 18th birthday.

And yet there are many more commenters who still haven’t grasped the idea that when a man and woman have sex, the woman gets pregnant. Why not practice abstinence? No sex, no pregnancy — but this is too much for them to process, apparently.


16 posted on 05/16/2013 11:46:37 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson