‘The tax law is relatively clear about what a (c)(4) can and cannot do. The IRS defines these groups as civic leagues, social welfare organizations, and local associations of employees. Their net earnings are supposed to be used for charitable, educational, or recreational purposes. They may lobby and participate in political activities but their primary purpose must not be campaigning.’
So they can participate in political activities. Maybe through fundraisers or whatever. But they were denied the chance, while Dem organizations were approved, and I do believe it affected the election.
I agree it gave the democrats an unfair advantage. I would just be cautious about stating that they could have used tax exempt money to help elect a particular party. If that were their purpose, they would not be tax exempt, and I suspect that is why they aren’t talking about it.
Krauthammer: “W]ere talking about is the IRS applying political criteria inexcusably, unconstitutionally, probably criminally and deciding who its going to investigate.”