If Obama gave an rescue order and it wasn’t obeyed he would be leading the charge to find the breakdown. But he is not.
Testimony is that two stand-down orders were issued. If those orders did not come from Obama he would be leading the charge to find who did. But he is not.
If Al Qaeda was not involved there would be no reason to scrub references from reports.
An operation involving AlQaeda was compromised, personnel at the scene were expendable. A known false story about a video was pushed.
Is arming AlQaeda is acceptable?
That’s some pretty good ergo you got goin on.
Look, I wish Obama was not the President. I especially wish he had not been re-elected.
My only interest in all of these scandals is which one (or ones) can lead to his removal.
His bad judgement, moral cowardice, and Muslim sympathies are not going to lead to his removal. They just aren’t. Impeachment is a political process, and the 62 million who voted for him know all about those things before they sent him back to the White House.
Crimes will get him out. And there are lots and lots of them.
Benghazi isn’t one. Of course he gave stand down orders. They were necessary to further his stupid foreign policy of Muslim engagement. The lies were not perjury, they were told by more than willing liars, not under oath.