Posted on 05/14/2013 2:24:15 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
White House campaign ,campaigning for what ,campaigning is over ,time to do your job
Shame, shame, shame on those who have none.
Carney will be fired in the next few months. He’s too much for anyone, even 0bama, to stomach.
Oh, like "The police acted stupidly..."? or, "Trayvon, my composite son... killed in a senseless, racially motivated shootdown..."? or, "Major Hassan acted alone... it was nothing more than workplace violence..."? //That mode? Very selective mode, obviously.
Gimme a break. This denial of White House involvement sounds as completely unlikely as Susan Rice’s press conference talking about some video as being the culprit for the Islamist Benghazi slayings and mayhem.
Charcoal Gray...
He’ll end up at NBC or some other God-forsaken Comcast company.
What I like about this ‘short bus’ Administration is that if the deficit comes down fifty cents, BO, jobama and the crew ‘throw a party’, taking ALL the credit.
However anything REMOTELY ‘bad’ is blamed on BUSH first, REPUBLICAN Congress second, then they may get around to an Agency involved, NEVER a Director (Patreaus is not a typical firing) or ‘hand picked’ Czar or such, always some underling WHO acted entirely on his own, AND BY GOD I just heard about it this morning when I sat down to breakfast with the family and the radio was on. Ruined my breakfast. I was putting milk on my Fruit Loops and I turned to Michelle and whispered (I don’t want my daughters to be involved politically)
“Hillary was definitely correct— as to a VAST RIGHT WING CONSPIRACY and, as that Limbaw fellow said, ‘I WANT OBAMA TO FAIL’.”
As I was packing the girls lunch I pondered how hard it must be for them in school because of all the meanness directed at ME.
Re: AP phone call investigation
If there was a leak that compromised highly classified information and if there was strong evidence the leak came from high up or inside, was there not a duty to investigate the likely sources and the receiver, the AP?
It seems reasonable that the correlation of administration phone records with AP records would yield the source and destination of the leak.
Having watched 13 episodes of House of Cards, I know that such work is done on cell phones. hat means the effort was not likely to turnup the desired correlation
“We are certain Benghazi was not an act of terrorism by Muslims” “We don’t know how committed the bombing in Boston, but we’re sure it’s an isolated incident.”
It must be fun to have a job where you are constantly on the lookout for getting axed for something your boss did.
If the White House press corp had any stones they ask Jay to leave the podium and send someone out who had a clue.
Which means the White House and the campaign were behind it.
Not any body, just "mistakes were made"
Oh, look, there's a mistake that made itself!
Bart Simpson. “I Didn’t Do It, Nobody Saw Me Do It, There’s No Way You Can Prove Anything!”
Kids these days.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.