[DiogenesLamp]

Diogenes you’ve never refuted Jeff and posting some obscure page from Pennsylvania that has never been referenced by the SC doesn’t change anything.

Yeah, about that supreme court. You know, the one that did the Wong Kim Ark ruling? Well they are the same supreme court which decided Plessy v Fergusson by an even bigger margin than they decided Wong.

Yeah, i'm thinking their credibility is blown to h3ll, and so it really doesn't matter what is their opinion as regards to Wong. They are almost as bad as the Tanney court in that respect.

As for the courts thinking they are the final arbiters? I disagree. That role is played by "We the People."

[HawkHogan]

Political question doctrine dictates that the SC will never touch the eligibility of the President. It’s too late for the SC to rule in your favor. Chester A. Arthur and Obama have both failed the meet the two parent test. The SC will never address this issue.