Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John McCain Introduces Cable A La Carte Legislation To Stop Bundling
Deadline ^ | 5/9/13 | DOMINIC PATTEN

Posted on 05/09/2013 12:34:44 PM PDT by Teflonic

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-152 next last
To: Buckeye McFrog

Right now, I’m sitting here in Las Vegas and Cox has Fox and HLN knocked off the air. Mighty strange! MSNBC is, though!


21 posted on 05/09/2013 12:45:17 PM PDT by lu shissler (an take his naiv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

Yes I dont need to pay for,3 network, 4 hispanic,2 religious and 15 others for the 2 or 3 I watch.
I only have CATV for a decent signal
Let McCain dick with this instead of getting into any gun legislation


22 posted on 05/09/2013 12:45:58 PM PDT by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

...and LOGO!


23 posted on 05/09/2013 12:46:10 PM PDT by Obadiah (High speed, low drag.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
seeing that the 1996 Telecommunications Act that you co-sponsored and rammed thru the Senate was perhaps the most corrupt piece of legislation ever considered

I have no doubt you are correct. Anything McCain proposes screws the citizens.

What was the giveaway in the 1996 Act?

24 posted on 05/09/2013 12:46:26 PM PDT by sand88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

I’m all for it. We had to fight to get Fox on in Las Vegas.


25 posted on 05/09/2013 12:46:55 PM PDT by lu shissler (an take his naiv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kevslisababy
I really think this nation has bigger problems they should be addressing than this.
I disagree. If the gov't hadn't stepped in and forced the split up of AT&T, we'd still be living with their 1960s style of monopoly.
Something has to be done to stop Cable from forcing us to pay for dozens and dozens of channels we don't want.
If channels like the Spanish channel, BET, religious channels, et al, can't make it on their own - TFB - hasta la vista, baby.
26 posted on 05/09/2013 12:46:58 PM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave

Exactly.


27 posted on 05/09/2013 12:47:11 PM PDT by lonevoice (Today I broke my personal record for most consecutive days lived)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Well as I said I haven’t had a cable bill for over 5 years now. If somethinmg like this were implemented I imagine there would be a flat fee for the connection then a separate varying charge for each channel you wanted. Some channels would be as expensive as HBO while others would only cost pennies. We’d see a lot of “free” promotions as well.


28 posted on 05/09/2013 12:47:24 PM PDT by Teflonic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Cheap hero legislation. Not his business.

How about dropping the damn taxes/fees?


29 posted on 05/09/2013 12:49:00 PM PDT by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevslisababy

If they would pass a law banning CNN from being displayed at airports, I’m all for it!


30 posted on 05/09/2013 12:49:36 PM PDT by 9422WMR (: " Tolerance is the virtue of a man who has no convictions".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic

I wish I could pick and choose what channels I pay for, aside from the obvious solution of not paying for any of them.

However, it is deeply insidious for us to continue down the path of dictating what services private companies must offer.


31 posted on 05/09/2013 12:50:10 PM PDT by andyk (I have sworn...eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic

I like this so far.

Might even consider subscribing to cable if it passes.

I don’t like the government over reach aspect of it, but since the cable companies got their monopolies through government power, it serves them right to have the terms of their service dictated. Lose the monopolies and they can bundle to their little hearts’ content, IMHO.

Not sure I’d apply it to satellite though.


32 posted on 05/09/2013 12:52:22 PM PDT by chrisser (Senseless legislation does nothing to solve senseless violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

>> If the gov’t hadn’t stepped in and forced the split up of AT&T, we’d still be living with their 1960s style of monopoly.

Doubtful. Furthermore, this is not about monopolies.


33 posted on 05/09/2013 12:52:50 PM PDT by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic

This is an attempt to help broadcast/cable industry. Too little, too late.

They are losing customers everyday to hulu, netflix, amazon, and so on.

The major holdback for most people is live sports. Eventually, this will be available via streaming.

I’ll weep tears of sorry for TimeWarner when it happens. Not.


34 posted on 05/09/2013 12:53:10 PM PDT by CriticalJ (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress.. But then I repeat myself. MT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SampleMan

Can count on one hand the ones I watch—Fox (less lately), HGTV, two Christian channels, HLN right now with the Arias murder trial. Get most of my news from FR and other like web sites.


35 posted on 05/09/2013 12:54:36 PM PDT by lu shissler (an take his naiv)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: longfellowsmuse

I would NOT be in favor of eliminating the Sports Blackout for publicly financed stadiums. When taxpayers pony up 1/2 $billion or more, they should be able to get their money back, and only have events shown with a 100% sell out game. That provision in the bill is a big WIN for the big money crowd.


36 posted on 05/09/2013 12:56:17 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic

So this is the most important thing on McCain’s plate right now? Cable bundling?


37 posted on 05/09/2013 12:56:40 PM PDT by 0.E.O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
$10/channel or 200 channels for $100. Take your choice.

That is what would probably happen, or they might even just delete what you don't watch but charge you the same. However, this is what I have long hoped for, if it could be done economically; I only watch 5 channels and I pay for 200.

And while we're talking about pay TV, why do I pay $100 a month for cable and yet I STILL have to watch 20 minutes of commercials an hour?

38 posted on 05/09/2013 12:58:00 PM PDT by Sender (It's never too late to be who you could have been.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic

He’s only slightly behind the technology curve, but legislators don’t let reality stand in their way.


39 posted on 05/09/2013 12:59:36 PM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teflonic

The FCC runs cable/sat . We need to have States take this over. Allow for feq sales at the state level would be the only option.

Being in Telecommunications this is para dine shift.


40 posted on 05/09/2013 1:00:49 PM PDT by Baseballguy (If we knew what we know now in Oct would we do anything different?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-152 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson