What is your end game here?I can't speak for others, but my "end game" is this.
The Constitution is sacred. Don't claim that it says BS that it doesn't say. And if you do, don't pretend to be a "conservative," because conservatives don't misrepresent the Founding Fathers and our Constitution.
Our laws are sacred too. I'm not very tolerant of people propagandizing that the law says such-and-such when it says no such thing.
If you want to change the Constitution, fine. Our Founding Fathers and Framers gave us a process to do that.
But don't misrepresent what it says, and try to con our fellow conservatives into believing stuff that just isn't true.
How can we possibly expect others to respect the Constitution if people posing as "conservatives" don't? How can we possibly expect truth in our society if we don't uphold the truth?
Aside from which, those people are making conservatives look like idiots. I don't appreciate that.
That's it.
The Constitution is sacred. Don't claim that it says BS that it doesn't say. And if you do, don't pretend to be a "conservative," because conservatives don't misrepresent the Founding Fathers and our Constitution. And here is one of the people I mentioned in my previous post.
Tell me Jeff, what part of British law supports Subjects breaking away from the Crown? The other day I was thinking about all the animosity directed at the idea that "natural born citizen" might have come from a Swiss writer. Then I got to thinking, Where in English law or Philosophy is a notion that a group of people can throw off a Monarchy?
And then I got to thinking about the Swiss. Do you know anything about the history of the Swiss? I suspect you don't, because from what i've seen of you, your knowledge of history is horribly ignorant. (Certainly of English History)
Where else in History did a group of people throw off their rulers and form their own country? Where was the precedent for the United States of America to follow?
Here's a f***ing clue for you.
