I understand your opinion, however according to the law you cited Sec. 301(a) he is not Article II eligible. Thank you for agreeing.
Sorry, but that's simply not true.
Nowhere does Section 301(a) say that. It just doesn't.
It's really a matter for the US Supreme Court to decide. But again, the Founding Fathers saw seem to have seen no conflict at all in declaring that someone born a citizen overseas was eligible to the Presidency.
Natural born citizens are citizens, too.
Just because a law says you're a citizen doesn't mean you aren't a natural born citizen.
Just doesn't.
And people have understood that being born a citizen made you qualified to be President since before 1800.
Ted Cruz is eligible.
And allow me to point out to anyone who may still be following this thread:
One side of the discussion has an actual argument. The other side has run out of anything meaningful to say, and is simply posting BS like repeating claims that have already been debunked, and posting pictures of some woman.