Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ray76
So you concede that a citizen by Sec. 301(a) as cited is not Article II eligible?

And by trying to twist my words, you show that you're not just an "innocent" birther, but a jerk like most of the rest of them.

As I've said many times before, Cruz's specific case has never been ruled on by the US Supreme Court. Most experts in the law believe he's eligible. I do too.

And YOU. YOU'RE here arguing that possibly the best conservative Presidential candidate we have is "not eligible," when he almost certainly is.

Jerk.

365 posted on 05/15/2013 12:06:23 AM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Winston
You cited “Sec. 301(a) The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth”

If this is how Cruz obtains citizenship then he is not Article II eligible.

Do you agree?

366 posted on 05/15/2013 12:16:10 AM PDT by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Winston

Whether or not he is the “best candidate” has no bearing on eligibility.


367 posted on 05/15/2013 12:17:11 AM PDT by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson