“I didn’t ask for a link. Your inability to read makes your attempt to persuade even shakier than before.”
You said: ”We’ve already discussed Purpura elsewhere. The court’s claims are not backed up by any legal citations, while the principle I’m talking about was brought up first in Shanks v. Dupont, affirmed in U.S. v. Rhodes and then affirmed again by U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark.”
I provided a link to the judge’s ruling in Purpura and his citations of both Minor v. Happersett and US v. Wong Kim Ark.
See? I CAN read after all!