Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nero Germanicus
You should re-read footnote #2 on page 6 of the ruling in Purpura and the citations from US v. Wong Kim Ark that are in the ruling.

If you think you have something compelling, YOU need to post it and not make other people go on a goose chase. So far, nothing you've posted is based on any stated legal precedent. Why would I believe this to be any different??

258 posted on 05/10/2013 5:08:27 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: edge919

Ok, fair enough.
Here’s the link:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/88936737/2012-04-10-NJ-Purpura-Moran-v-Obama-Initial-Decision-of-ALJ-Masin-Apuzzo

Bottom of page 6 is the footnote.


259 posted on 05/10/2013 6:32:02 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson