Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

American Energy Independence Is A Complete Myth
BusinessInsider.Com ^ | 05/07/2013 | Rob Wile

Posted on 05/07/2013 11:02:26 AM PDT by DannyTN

Lots of people think American energy independence is within reach thanks to our shale boom.

...

It's been a long time since producing all your own oil actually made you independent. We spent 40 years transforming global markets so they were integrated and flexible, to give us protection from the vagaries of global oil production, and one of the side effects is we're now part of that, even if we produce all our own oil. ...

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: energy; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-159 next last
To: C. Edmund Wright

We are at historic low import tariffs, historic high unemployment, historic high trade deficits and historic high government debt.

In case you didn't hear him.

61 posted on 05/07/2013 12:02:14 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: central_va

I never said I was against all tariffs, and never said I was against EVER using trade as a weapon. It punishes our people to do so, but sometimes it’s necessary. BTW, the life of the average Japanese and certainly of the average person in China is not really a ringing endorsement of what their governments are doing.

That doesnt’ change the fact that you are using vacuums and fantasies about 100% this way or that way to discredit what I was saying, and your argument doing so was specious and backfired. Besides, you look at countries as a single entity, and sorry dude, that’s not how commerce is done.


62 posted on 05/07/2013 12:03:15 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
Everyone who has ever eaten carrots has died, or will die. So, are carrots poisonous? By your logic, they are.

That is insultingly stupid analogy. Go back to your Chinese handlers and get a better come back.

63 posted on 05/07/2013 12:03:35 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Right, and Obama Care, absurd minimum wages, out of control government spending, out of control bureaucratic meddling, out of control Fed policy, had NOTHING to do with that right?

You guys have just told Reagan Sowell and Friedman to go fk themselves. I will no longer tolerate your hyper conflation and sheer left wing central planning liberal economic bullshit. Go start a fkn comapny or STFU


64 posted on 05/07/2013 12:05:16 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Chinese hanlders? You’re a moron.
Lonald Leagan
Mirton Fleedman
Thomas Sowerrr.


65 posted on 05/07/2013 12:06:07 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: central_va

ah so , and so sowwy my anrogy lent ovel your hed.


66 posted on 05/07/2013 12:07:03 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
""WE" don't produce oil. Those folks who have accumulated the capital and have acquired the expertise to produce oil will stop producing it and direct their efforts elsewhere if "WE" decide to confiscate it, or its value, for "OUR" social purposes."

I'm willing to take that gamble. Lets raise the import tariffs back up to historic norms and see if it doesn't "discourage production" in China. And let's see if there aren't folks here in America who have the capital and expertise and willingness to meet the American market demands.

67 posted on 05/07/2013 12:07:44 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: central_va

“As the leader of the West and as a country that has become great and rich because of economic freedom, America must be an unrelenting advocate of free trade.”

Ronald Reagan (but I gess he had chinese masters too?)


68 posted on 05/07/2013 12:09:15 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
Nuclear power is 98%.

No. It isn't even close to that.

Nuclear power is a thermal engine. It generates heat to go through a turbine and has to go through a condenser to cool the working water in order to make the cycle complete. It is bound by the Carnot cycle.

The average efficiency of the US nuclear power plants is 32.6%. They take on average 10,464 BTUs of heat to produce 1 kilowatt-hour of electrical energy. A kilowatt-hour has 3,412 BTUs.

The average Natural Gas power plant is 41.8% efficient taking 8,152 BTUs to produce a kilowatt-hour of electrical energy.

Average Operating Heat Rate for Selected Energy Sources
http://www.eia.gov/electricity/annual/html/epa_08_01.html

69 posted on 05/07/2013 12:10:29 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
..."reversing the gains from bringing economies closer together."

If he doesn't mean the gains for JPM and Goldman et al, then that is damned hilarious.

70 posted on 05/07/2013 12:11:35 PM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Milton Friedman, on orders from HIS Chinese handlers:
“One voice that is hardly ever raised is the consumer’s. That voice is drowned out in the cacophony of the “interested sophistry of merchants and manufacturers” and their employees. The result is a serious distortion of the issue. For example, the supporters of tariffs treat it as self evident that the creation of jobs is a desirable end, in and of itself, regardless of what the persons employed do. That is clearly wrong. If all we want are jobs, we can create any number—for example, have people dig holes and then fill them up again or perform other useless tasks. Work is sometimes its own reward. Mostly, however, it is the price we pay to get the things we want. Our real objective is not just jobs but productive jobs—jobs that will mean more goods and services to consume.

Another fallacy seldom contradicted is that exports are good, imports bad. The truth is very different. We cannot eat, wear, or enjoy the goods we send abroad. We eat bananas from Central America, wear Italian shoes, drive German automobiles, and enjoy programs we see on our Japanese TV sets. Our gain from foreign trade is what we import. Exports are the price we pay to get imports. As Adam Smith saw so clearly, the citizens of a nation benefit from getting as large a volume of imports as possible in return for its exports or, equivalently, from exporting as little as possible to pay for its imports.

The misleading terminology we use reflects these erroneous ideas. “Protection” really means exploiting the consumer. A “favorable balance of trade” really means exporting more than we import, sending abroad goods of greater total value than the goods we get from abroad. In your private household, you would surely prefer to pay less for more rather than the other way around, yet that would be termed an “unfavorable balance of payments” in foreign trade.

The argument in favor of tariffs that has the greatest emotional appeal to the public at large is the alleged need to protect the high standard of living of American workers from the “unfair” competition of workers in Japan or Korea or Hong Kong who are willing to work for a much lower wage. What is wrong with this argument? Don’t we want to protect the high standard of living of our people?

The fallacy in this argument is the loose use of the terms “high” wage and “low” wage. What do high and low wages mean? American workers are paid in dollars; Japanese workers are paid in yen. How do we compare wages in dollars with wages in yen? How many yen equal a dollar? What determines the exchange rate?


71 posted on 05/07/2013 12:12:03 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

Ronald Reagan promoted free trade, but he also made the Japanese produce cars on American soil using American labor. Remember the “voluntary quotas”. He also protected motorcycles. Reagan certainly wasn’t an idealogue that was committed to free trade “no matter what”.


72 posted on 05/07/2013 12:15:04 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Can you point to a single technical article of any of the advanced contained reactors that mentioned cheap?

Probably not, but I'm also not going to waste a bunch of time looking.

What's cheap? If you pay only $100 a month for electricity that's $24,000 over 20 years. If you have 200 houses in your neighborhood you're looking at $4.8 million.

If you only put these in 100,000 locations at $2 million a pop you are looking at a $200 Billion dollar industry. The only real obstacle I see is government and the people who can afford to buy the government off.

73 posted on 05/07/2013 12:15:48 PM PDT by Pan_Yan (I believe in God. All else is dubious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright

On the other hand having your oil supply (and other critical resources) close at hand is vital in the case of a war. I don’t see us ever being energy independent but I’d like to see our energy needs supplied from the new world.


74 posted on 05/07/2013 12:17:20 PM PDT by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
The biggest problem in discussing free trade is defining what free trade is compared to our "free trade" agreements that are anything but free trade.

It's the same as those violently opposed to deregulation because of what happened in the CA energy market and on wall street but they just can't get it through their head that there was never any deregulation of either market. Politicians in cahoots with industry insiders simply came up with a way to make a lot more money and called their new regulations "deregulation". Just like they call our a lot of our completely unbalanced trade agreements "free trade" when it is anything but. Then people argue against "free trade" when they have never seen it. Certainly we haven't had a free market in America since the 1930's.

I can't say I particularly agree with the concept of tariffs, but I would suggest that practically any revenue raising measure would be less pernicously anti-liberty than an income tax.

75 posted on 05/07/2013 12:18:11 PM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

No, he was an ideologue indeed - but you are being an idiot to pick and choose micro decisions that were made at certain points. Besides, I said that there are always exceptions in a given situation, where trade would be used as a weapon...but it’s always used to reinstate freer trade in the end. You’re arguing like a lib, saying that anyone who uses military force is anti-peace.

Sometimes you have to use violence to restore peace, and sometimes you have to use trade as a weapon, to restore freer trade.


76 posted on 05/07/2013 12:18:28 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: thackney; SatinDoll
I couldn't care less about "efficiency".

I want abundant cheap energy. And i don't care if the process is "efficient". If nuclear had only a .0001 efficiency but still produced lots of power and doesn't use up our fossil fuels and doesn't cost more than the fossil fuels then who really cares whether it's efficient or not?

77 posted on 05/07/2013 12:19:17 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Your post #54 could be fleshed out and submitted as an editorial piece in its own right. Everyone has their pet theory, but the troublesome and undeniable facts remain as you cited.


78 posted on 05/07/2013 12:20:26 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Go back to your Chinese handlers and get a better come back.

"It is amazing how many people think that they can answer an argument by attributing bad motives to those who disagree with them. Using this kind of reasoning, you can believe or not believe anything about anything, without having to bother to deal with facts or logic. "

Thomas Sowell, completing the destruction of your argument.

79 posted on 05/07/2013 12:21:07 PM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (Tokyo Rove is more than a name, it's a GREAT WEBSITE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: C. Edmund Wright
"You’re arguing like a lib, saying that anyone who uses military force is anti-peace."

I hardly think that. I'm arguing that Free trade the way it's implemented now has devasted our industries and caused our massive unemployment.

But once we are back at full employment and have restored key industries, then I'm all for taking advantage of the cheap communist labor.

I just don't think it makes sense when we have high unemployment. Our first duty is to our own people.

80 posted on 05/07/2013 12:21:39 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson