Nope, we are calling *YOU* Horse sh*t for intentionally misrepresenting their words and intent so as to falsely appear to agree with your stupid theory.
Even with your response, you attempt to falsely mislead people into thinking this is a dispute with the founders, when in fact it is a dispute with *YOU*!
Jim, can I ask: Why is this being tolerated here at FreeRepublic? I simply don't understand.
As Jim Robinson lives in California, I suspect he is not very sympathetic to your stupid theory that he should have to live with the "Anchor baby" consequences of it. YOU are helping Foreigners over run us!!!!! You have become an enabler of the destruction of our Nation.
I've accurately represented every single word. You can't point out one single sentence, one single word that I've misrepresented in any way.
That being the case, it's THEIR words and THEIR intent that you are defaming and calling "horse sh*t."
Of course, along the way, you also defame every conservative that stands up here for those words our Founding Generation spoke.
As Jim Robinson lives in California, I suspect he is not very sympathetic to your stupid theory that he should have to live with the "Anchor baby" consequences of it. YOU are helping Foreigners over run us!!!!! You have become an enabler of the destruction of our Nation.
Once again (as is your practice) you spin a bunch of BS about those who oppose your trashing of our Constitution and laws.
I've said elsewhere that I believe there's at least some room in the law to challenge birth tourism (which is certainly a problem but which, by the way, represents something less than 1/5th of 1% of births in the United States). And I CERTAINLY believe that giving citizenship to the children of illegal aliens (which is a FAR, FAR bigger issue) is not within the spirit of the historical rule of citizenship, which required aliens to be legally present. As I have said before, I think Congress could certainly pass a law denying US citizenship to the children of illegal aliens, and see whether the courts will uphold it.
I could be wrong about this, but I believe that Jim Robinson regards our Constitution as sacred, as do I and many others at this site. I find it offensive that you and others continually trash and misrepresent both our Constitution and the words of our Founding Fathers, our laws, and our Founding Generation.