Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MMaschin

Minor v Happersett was a 14th Amendment/women’s suffrage appeal.
Attempts to apply its holding to Obama have consistently failed.
For example: Allen v Obama, Arizona Superior Court Judge Richard E. Gordon: “Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent in construing the United States Constitution, and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President. Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874), does not hold otherwise.”—Pima County Superior Court, Tuscon, Arizona, March 7, 2012
http://www.scribd.com/doc/84531299/AZ-2012-03-07-Allen-v-Obama-C20121317-ORDER-Dismissing-Complaint


113 posted on 05/06/2013 10:54:36 AM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: Nero Germanicus

Still here defending your boy I see.


115 posted on 05/06/2013 11:01:15 AM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (Medicine is the keystone in the arch of socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

To: Nero Germanicus
Attempts to apply its holding to Obama have consistently failed.

Which proves nothing. Dred Scott v Sanford failed too.

154 posted on 05/06/2013 1:21:50 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson