Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vermont Lt
While not a fan of JMK, I feel obligated to point out to the folks in government that they should have finished his book. Yes, his policy calls for the government to stimulate the economy by issuing debt to get the velocity of money moving.

However, that part they forgot to read was when revenues started coming in, you are supposed to pay down the debt so that you had the ability to be stimulative again, when the cycle changed.

Seems like part I is fun. Part II is not. So our government just blew it off.

That's very true. I too will not defend JMK, but most people get him wrong on that score. His deficit spending in recession proposition assumed also that in years of economic boom... Surpluses would be "banked" for the next recession. Something modern Keynesians have utterly ignored.

41 posted on 05/04/2013 8:12:45 PM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us one chance in three. More tea anyone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Ramius

We’re all still waiting for the economic boom from Obama’s “stimulus.” What, did Obama not spend enough?


47 posted on 05/04/2013 8:23:19 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

To: Ramius
His deficit spending in recession proposition assumed also that in years of economic boom... Surpluses would be "banked" for the next recession. Something modern Keynesians have utterly ignored.

Why? Because when government spending doesn't result in economic growth, government spending is increased, further delaying recovery and prompting more government spending.

It's a vicious Keynesian circle.

107 posted on 05/06/2013 4:54:54 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson