Well, yes. This was obvious to me way back in the 1950s, when I was in college.
As the article says, Keynes’s best-known quote is: “In the long run we are all dead.” This was in response to the question, What will your economic policy do in the long run? Isn’t it very dangerous? Well, Keynes responded, “In the long run, we are all dead.”
Meaning, it doesn’t matter if the economy turns into a gigantic bubble down the line, and there is massive future hyperinflation, since we won’t be around to suffer the consequences anyway. So, who cares?
Obviously, that is the attitude of someone who doesn’t ever intend to have children, and could care less what happens to the next generation, after he is dead.
I.e., a homosexual.
A homosexual plays no part in CREATING the next generation, so like I said in a post on this thread, their worldview should be expected to be, uhhhh, “incomplete” at best.
That is just the way it is, and that’s why it’s more surprising to find homosexuals among Conservatives than among the “apres moi le deluge” Liberal types.
Of course, but there’s always some tricky rhetorical footwork
at play here: the various demographics including homosexuals, who support Obama, and his thoroughly reckless policies unconcerned about repercussions lying in wait in the future, would argue that THEY are the ones who are thinking of and planning for the REAL future we will all share in. You know, the one with all that wonderful green energy,TRUE energy independence, Islam becoming democracy, windmills, electric cars, no fracking, no oil pipelines or shale exploration,etc. etc.