“I guess how you choose to see this is entirely related to whether you desire to see more free porn on the internet or less. If you don’t want your freebies cut off the of course she is an awful hypocrite.”
Huh? I call it immorality and you accuse me of being immoral?
Wow! That is a stretch! ;-)
You have made it clear you oppose her efforts on the basis of her earlier transgressions.
Absolutely I call you immoral.
Under your Pharisaical standards there is zero room for King David or the Apostle Paul, both of whom were orders of magnitude more immoral than merely giving a boyfriend a salacious picture.
I suppose you might he considered moral by other Muslims if you are following Islam. But under Judaism or Christianity repentance and restoration are moral principles whether you like it or not.
There is none perfect.
No, not one.
So, all that is left is should it be allowed to spread naked pictures of people all over? I say it is not. The woman says it is not. We have you on record for supporting the position that it is not okay to oppose the spreading of naked images if someone ever spread one around of you. Ergot, you are against opposing the naked pictures while claiming not to be for them.
Passive aggressive you are.
Self righteous you are.
Moral, you are not. Unless its Islamic morality.