You can keep repeating the same stupidity over and over again, it isn’t going to make it true.
There is a reason there was a schism in the Libertarian Party after Browne died. Those philosophical libertarians, like me, saw the take over from within by radical Leftists more interested in smoking pot and buggering each other than in pushing real issues like property Rights, Bill of Rights enforcement, etc...
We ejected. Part of the “politically homeless”. Folks like Jason Lewis, Thomas Sowell, L. Neil Smith, John Stossel, and others fit this category. We’re “too” small government for people like you. We don’t see the Constitution giving you all the control that you seem to think you need.
So, you conveniently lump us in with the Ron Paulites and refuse to listen to anything else we have to say no matter how much sense it makes or how conservative or a position it really is.
For instance, abortion. You keep trying to tell me that I can’t be a libertarian and be pro-life at the same time. Even though i told you the reasoning behind my stance and that it fits perfectly well within the philosophy if not the political Parties wishy-washy plank statement.
You can even go back through my posting history and see where i have voted a pretty strict Republican ticket, save a few where the Democrat was running unopposed by a GOP candidate.
So who is lying about who here?
You are making it up about the party being taken over and changed into something that it wasn't, their pot smoking abortion open borders etc stuff never changed.
I didn't tell you that you can't be pro-life and not be a libertarian.
There is a reason there was a schism in the Libertarian Party after Browne died.
So you accepted the party positions before Browne died in 2006, or before his presidential run of 1996, or 2000 or what?