[mdittmar]

Looking forward to those raspberry filled donuts again;)

[sitetest]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Good luck with that, assholes!

I once did contract work for this bunch of thugs. The first thing they told me after we signed the contract was that we would do good work for them or they would harm us physically.

Even back then (1980s), there top brass were making mid- to upper-six figures.

Bunch of damned thieves.

[Venturer]

I am sure Hostess would welcome back the employees -—as long as they drop their membership in the unions that destroyed their predecesser.

Getting bit by a rattlesnake does not mean they should hire that rattlesnake again.

The Union is threatening to rape this company before it even gets started.

[pabianice]

I just don’t understand. What compassionate company would balk at paying a truck-driver $135,000 a year in salary and benefits?

[Some Fat Guy in L.A.]

They are where they are because of these union fools - why would they want to hire them back?

[This I Wonder32460]

When they are available again, I may just have to start buying a package a week, though I would have to give them to the local food pantry, since I need to start limiting my sweet intake. I’d do this to help the company keep going and continue to be free . . .

[Blue Collar Christian]

Let’s see...if I could hire non-union workers instead of union workers...doesn’t seem like a very difficult decision.

[hattend]

We believe their combination of experience, dedication and know-how

Guess they shouldn't have threatened a strike. Sort of throws "dedication" right out the window.

[Vaquero]

The new Hostess is firing up plants in Columbus, Ga.; Emporia, Kan.; Schiller Park, Ill.; and Indianapolis, Ind. It's also considering whether to reopen a fifth plant it purchased, in Los Angeles. (from a different article)

so 3 of the 5 are in right to work states...they should move the Ill plant and forget about the Los Angeles plant altogether....or perhaps move the equipment to NV or AZ.