To: whitedog57
Apparently I've stumbled into one of those FR threads full of Freepers who are without sin.
I know I have no business here. I'll be over at the naughty teacher thread with Laz leering at bewbs.
34 posted on
04/24/2013 11:16:29 AM PDT by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: billorites
Just because no one is without sin doesn’t mean we should excuse sin
36 posted on
04/24/2013 11:17:36 AM PDT by
GeronL
(http://asspos.blogspot.com)
To: billorites
Apparently I've stumbled into one of those FR threads full of Freepers who are without sin. If she had a "partner" she not only wasn't struggling against her sin but almost certainly didn't even acknowledge it as a sin.
37 posted on
04/24/2013 11:18:17 AM PDT by
JustSayNoToNannies
(I'll stick to facts and logic, and not follow into the gutter those who make disagreements personal.)
To: billorites
“I’ll be over at the naughty teacher thread with Laz leering at bewbs.”
Don’t let the door hit you on the @$$ on your way out.
79 posted on
04/24/2013 12:08:13 PM PDT by
MichaelCorleone
(Keep your eyes on Jesus. He is the same yesterday, today, and forever.)
To: billorites
Go and sin no more. And put the stones down.
To: billorites
Apparently I've stumbled into one of those FR threads full of Freepers who are without sin. We all sin all the time. But we don't justify it, like this woman, calling evil "good" and referring with righteous indignity to her "partner". Mary Magdalene was not persisting in flagrante delicto nor did she subsequently vault onto the nearest available lover when Jesus commanded her to "go and sin no more". In fact in today's reprobate generation calling sin a "sin" is considered the cruelest stone Jesus could throw.
130 posted on
04/25/2013 2:23:33 AM PDT by
Theophilus
(Not merely prolife, but prolific)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson