Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cynwoody

Thanks for the additional info.

Had not heard about the call from the FBI on Thursday.

Does this mean they were more aware than they have admitted of his potential and the danger? Does it mean he was in fact actively monitored?

Or does it mean they (or NSA) heard some tidbit of his cell phone or internet traffic? (sounds more likely)


134 posted on 04/24/2013 3:35:14 AM PDT by Texas Fossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Fossil
Does this mean they were more aware than they have admitted of his potential and the danger? Does it mean he was in fact actively monitored?

I doubt it. I believe the FBI has stated they didn't learn the identities until shortly after the Watertown shootout.

To me, the report (if true) confirms that the FBI was not yet onto him, that they still considered him of peripheral interest, as somebody to be ruled out as a matter of due diligence. If they had considered him a serious suspect, I'm sure they would have shown up in force at 410 Norfolk Street and pulled him in.

The FBI's Thursday press conference was a good move. It smoked 'em out. Even though the released photos and videos didn't show the faces well enough for identification, the brothers had to know the game was up. Better photos would be found (they were, by early Friday morning). Or somebody would recognize them and report them. So, they made their chaotic getaway attempt, in which MIT Officer Sean Collier was killed.

137 posted on 04/24/2013 12:00:49 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson