[so_real]

What you've provided is rational for revoking citizenship (future tense) after certain criteria have been met. The process of revoking citizenship begins after the fact. However, what Graham is discussing, is treating a U.S. citizen (present tense) as if he were not a U.S. citizen (present tense) because of the criteria that were met. His claim is that some acts (arbitrarily determined by government) are so heinous that government can ignore citizenship and the rights and protections afforded by it. That's criminal.

By all means initiate the process to revoke his citizenship. But do it through "due process". And treat him as every inch the citizen he was naturalized to be between now and such time as it is done.

[TigersEye]

What I provided was the statute law of the United States.